Home Finance OpenAI investors push to reinstate Sam Altman as CEO

OpenAI investors push to reinstate Sam Altman as CEO


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

OpenAI investors are working to get rid of the company’s board and reinstate Sam Altman as chief executive of the generative AI start-up, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation, in what would amount to a spectacular counter-coup they are confident could be concluded this weekend.

A group of investors including Microsoft and prominent venture capital firms, along with employees at the company, were exploring options to resolve the crisis, according to three people briefed on the discussions.

These options include removing the board of the non-profit that oversees OpenAI and reinstalling Altman, who was pushed out of the ChatGPT parent on Friday, and co-founder Greg Brockman, who quit the company hours later, sending shockwaves through Silicon Valley.

With the board and his backers at an impasse on Saturday night, Altman posted “i love the openai team so much” on X. Within an hour hundreds of current OpenAI employees — including interim CEO Mira Murati and chief operating officer Brad Lightcap — had liked or reposted the tweet, often echoing Altman’s sentiment.

“Since the minute [Altman was sacked] this has been in the works,” said one of the people involved in the effort to reinstate the former boss. Major investors in OpenAI, including Thrive Capital, Tiger Global and Sequoia Capital, have been in touch with Microsoft and with Altman over the weekend to explore possible next steps, according to the three people familiar with the discussions.

One of the people, a leading investor in OpenAI, is confident that they can dispose of the board and reinstate Altman and Brockman before the weekend is out. Investors are hoping that Altman would return to a company “which has been his life’s work,” and that Mira Murati, promoted from chief technology officer to interim chief executive on Friday, would stay at the company, added the person.

But other venture funds are hedging their bets, committing to support Altman whatever he chooses to do next, be that a return to OpenAI or launching a new venture, according to two venture fund investors.

Vinod Khosla, an early venture backer of OpenAI, said on Saturday evening that he wanted to see Altman back at OpenAI, “but will back him in whatever he does next”.

Microsoft, Thrive Capital, Tiger Global and Sequoia declined to comment. OpenAI could not immediately be reached for comment.

The board said it had removed Altman on Friday because he had not been “consistently candid” in his conversations with them.

Investors and employees could refuse further backing or quit the company in an attempt to force the board to reinstate him. A plan to sell as much as $1bn in employee stock, which was nearing completion, is also in the balance as a result of the division between the board and investors. Thrive Capital was set to lead that tender offer, which was expected to value OpenAI at $86bn.

The OpenAI board’s abrupt decision to oust Altman and demote Brockman on Friday has drawn attention to its unusual corporate structure and governance. That board oversees a non-profit entity that owns a for-profit company.

Unlike a typical for-profit, where fiduciary duties are owed to shareholders, OpenAI’s board is committed to a charter that pledges to ensure AI is developed for the benefit of all humanity.

“They hurt the company. In a real company there is a fiduciary responsibility. The first rule for [OpenAI’s] board is ‘do no harm’ . . . They caused the company immense harm,” said a person involved in efforts to reinstate Altman.

The board includes OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever along with independent directors Adam D’Angelo, the chief executive of Quora; technology entrepreneur Tasha McCauley; and Helen Toner from the Georgetown Center for Security and Emerging Technology.

OpenAI’s board has said nothing publicly about what caused the split with Altman beyond its statement on Friday. According to investors, tensions over the speed at which the former chief executive wanted to deploy powerful AI tools had stoked board concerns that the safety of those tools could be compromised. “They had an argument about moving too fast. That’s it,” said one of the investors.

Additional reporting by Richard Waters in San Francisco

Source link