Home Economy Social circular economy for sustainable development in European Union member countries: a fuzzy logic-based evaluation

Social circular economy for sustainable development in European Union member countries: a fuzzy logic-based evaluation

0
Social circular economy for sustainable development in European Union member countries: a fuzzy logic-based evaluation


  • Busu C, Busu M (2018) Modeling the circular economy processes at the EU level using an evaluation algorithm based on Shannon entropy. Processes 6:225. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6110225

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Büyüközkan G, Göçer F (2017) Smart medical device selection based on interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR. Advances in fuzzy logic and technology 2017. Warszawa, Poland, pp 306–317


    Google Scholar
     

  • Büyüközkan G, Göçer F, Feyzioğlu O (2018) Cloud computing technology selection based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM methods. Soft Comput 22:5091–5114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3317-4

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Candan G, Cengiz Toklu M (2022) A comparative analysis of the circular economy performances for European union countries. Int J Sust Dev World 29:653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2084794

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chineme A, Assefa G, Herremans IM et al (2022) African indigenous female entrepreneurs (IFÉs): a closed-looped social circular economy waste management model. Sustainability 14:11628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811628

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiu IH-Y (2022) The EU sustainable finance agenda: developing governance for double materiality in sustainability metrics. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 23:87–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00229-9

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clube RKM, Tennant M (2022) Social inclusion and the circular economy: the case of a fashion textiles manufacturer in Vietnam. Bus Strat Dev 5:4–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.179

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • D’Amato D, Korhonen J (2021) Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecol Econ 188:107143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doumpos M, Figueira JR (2019) A multicriteria outranking approach for modeling corporate credit ratings: an application of the electre Tri-nC method. Omega 82:166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.01.003

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El Wali M, Golroudbary SR, Kraslawski A (2021) Circular economy for phosphorus supply chain and its impact on social sustainable development goals. Sci Total Environ 777:146060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146060

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eurostat (2021) https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database. Accessed 12 Feb 2023

  • García-Muiña F, Medina-Salgado MS, González-Sánchez R et al (2021) Industry 4.0-based dynamic social organizational life cycle assessment to target the social circular economy in manufacturing. J Clean Prod 327:129439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129439

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giannakitsidou O, Giannikos I, Chondrou A (2020) Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: a DEA application in MSW. Waste Manag 109:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grigoroudis E, Kouikoglou VS, Phillis YA (2021) SAFE 2019: updates and new sustainability findings worldwide. Ecol Ind 121:107072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107072

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Janković Šoja S, Anokić A, Bucalo Jelić D, Maletić R (2016) Ranking EU countries according to their level of success in achieving the objectives of the sustainable development strategy. Sustainability 8:306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040306

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ju-Long D (1982) Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 1:288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kahraman C, Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK et al (2017) Intuitionistic Fuzzy EDAS method: An application to solid waste disposal site selection. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 25(01):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2017.1281139

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaya SK, Ayçin E, Pamucar D (2022) Evaluation of social factors within the circular economy concept for European countries. Cent Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-022-00800-w

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li C, Jiang H (2011) Extension of VIKOR method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. 2011 international conference on management and service science. IEEE, Wuhan, China, pp 1–4


    Google Scholar
     

  • Luzzati T, Gucciardi G (2015) A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: an illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU Countries. Ecol Econ 113:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.018

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marino A, Pariso P (2020) Comparing European countries’ performances in the transition towards the circular economy. Sci Total Environ 729:138142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138142

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazur-Wierzbicka E (2021) Towards circular economy—a comparative analysis of the countries of the European union. Resources 10:49. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10050049

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mies A, Gold S (2021) Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. J Clean Prod 321:128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moreau V, Sahakian M, van Griethuysen P, Vuille F (2017) Coming full circle: Why social and ınstitutional dimensions matter for the circular economy. J Ind Ecol 21:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onar SC, Oztaysi B, Otay İ, Kahraman C (2015) Multi-expert wind energy technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Energy 90:274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.086

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Padilla-Rivera A, do Carmo BBT, Arcese G, Merveille N (2021) Social circular economy indicators: selection through fuzzy delphi method. Sustain Prod Consum 26:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.015

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodriguez-Anton JM, Rubio-Andrada L, Celemín-Pedroche MS, Alonso-Almeida MDM (2019) Analysis of the relations between circular economy and sustainable development goals. Int J Sust Dev World 26:708–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1666754

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sachs JD, Lafortune G, Kroll C et al (2022) Sustainable development report 2022. Cambridge University Press

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schönborn G, Berlin C, Pinzone M et al (2019) Why social sustainability counts: the impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustain Prod Consum 17:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.008

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schröder P, Lemille A, Desmond P (2020) Making the circular economy work for human development. Resour Conserv Recycl 156:104686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Social dimension of circular economy-report of the workshop (2019). European economic and social committee

  • Sueyoshi T, Wang DD (2020) Rank dynamics and club convergence of sustainable development for countries around the world. J Clean Prod 250:119480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119480

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tan C, Chen X (2013) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on VIKOR and Choquet integral. J Appl Math 2013:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/656879

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ūsas J, Balezentis T, Streimikiene D (2021) Development and integrated assessment of the circular economy in the European union: the outranking approach. JEIM. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-11-2020-0440

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker AM, Opferkuch K, Roos Lindgreen E et al (2021) Assessing the social sustainability of circular economy practices: industry perspectives from Italy and the Netherlands. Sustain Prod Consum 27:831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.030

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woschnack D, Hiss S, Nagel S, Teufel B (2021) Sustainability disclosure and the financialization of social sustainability. Account Econ Law: A Convivium. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2018-0053

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu H-H (2002) A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Qual Eng 15:209–217. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120015853

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wuyts W, Miatto A, Sedlitzky R, Tanikawa H (2019) Extending or ending the life of residential buildings in Japan: a social circular economy approach to the problem of short-lived constructions. J Clean Prod 231:660–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.258

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu Z, Cai X (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation: theory and applications. Science Press; Springer, Beijing : Berlin;New York

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang F, Xu S (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making method based on utility theory under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Group Decis Negot 25:1261–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9473-y

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao H, Xu Z, Yao Z (2016) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy derivative and differential operations. IJCIS 9:36. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2016.1144152

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link