President of Argentina Javier Milei at the 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) [Photo by Gage Skidmore / CC BY-SA 2.0]

On February 14, 2025, at 7:01 p.m., Argentina’s fascist President Javier Milei used his X account to promote $LIBRA, a cryptocurrency launched 23 minutes earlier. The launch attracted massive investment, rapidly driving its market capitalization to about $4.5 billion. Just three hours later, the asset had lost 89 percent of its value. Fifty thousand buyers collectively lost about $251 million, while the nine founding wallets collected $87 million. Five hours after posting it, the president deleted his tweet.

Defend his conduct, Milei stated in an interview that he had promoted the cryptocurrency “as a citizen, tweeting from his personal account, and not as president.” The effort was evident: to present the case as the isolated deviation of an adventurous political neophyte.

Eighteen months later, the government itself refuted this version. In official statements, it admitted to having diverted more than 1 trillion pesos from a public fund created to finance road works—the SisVial—into financial investments: exactly what $LIBRA had done in secret. Far from being an aberration, the crypto scandal was the first crack through which the flagrantly criminal mode of operation of the entire government became visible.

The diversion of Integrated Road System (SisVial) funds

On August 9, 2026, writing for La Nación, Hugo Alconada Mon reported that “for two and a half years, the government of Javier Milei collected more than 1.5 trillion pesos in the trust fund created to finance road works, but allocated only a quarter of that amount to that purpose. At the end of last May, it held more than 1 trillion pesos in financial investments, such as fixed-term deposits and government bonds” (our translation, as with all other quotations from Spanish).

The SisVial is a trust fund that captures part of the fuel tax, with a legally exclusive purpose: road construction and maintenance. It was created in 2001 at the insistence of the World Bank, precisely to prevent this revenue from being diverted to other ends. It is exactly this safeguard, designed by international finance capital itself, that the Milei government now uses as a vehicle for the diversion.

The figures, reconstructed by La Nación from accounting balance sheets and official documents, confirm and detail this distortion: of the 1.5 trillion pesos collected in two-and-a-half years, only a quarter was spent on works—an underspending rate of 73.8 percent. A former director of the bank BICE described the logic as that of a “mesa de dinero” (trading desk): public works at a standstill, resources directed toward speculation.

Meanwhile, between 65 and 70 percent of Argentina’s national highways are in fair or poor condition, and public works have been practically paralyzed for two and a half years. The governor of Santa Fe described his province’s roads as “no longer having potholes, but craters.” It is not a lack of money: it is a decision about where to put the money—for every peso spent on asphalt, 77 pesos went into financial investments. “Behind the numbers there are people who die on the roads,” an economist consulted by La Nación summarized.

Given this, the confession of Argentina’s current government spokesman, Adrián Ravier, is the purest formulation of the government’s policy. Asked about the destination of the money, he admitted that “part of these taxes goes to Vialidad (the national roads agency) and the other part is administered by the Ministry of Economy as part of the efforts to achieve fiscal balance.” Asked how much went to road maintenance, he refused to answer: “What I cannot say right now is how much of what is collected is being allocated to road maintenance.”

Ravier took the post in June 2026, replacing Manuel Adorni—who held the job alongside serving as Milei’s chief of cabinet. He resigned from both posts that month as a result of his involvement in the $LIBRA crypto-asset scandal.

If in the SisVial case the plunder passed through the ordinary apparatus of the state, in $LIBRA it ran through the personal channel of the president and his family network. Even so, it is the concentrated, personalized and internationalized version of the same operation: extracting value without producing anything, using the state as a vehicle—except that here the victim is not those who die on the roads for lack of maintenance, but those who lost their savings buying a crypto asset endorsed by the president himself.



Source link